
In Search of a Cyclops
the proof of nothing a theory of everything ©
Conclusion
Because knowing an outcome beforehand often helps us understand a delivery better
Writing or reading a delivery about everything is probably as complicated a task as it can get. Yet this delivery should not be that complicated in writing that it interferes with getting the conclusion. It is true that sometimes words can get in the way. So, taking most of the writing out, here is the conclusion of In Search of a Cyclops. Be forewarned that you may like the conclusion in short form a lot; but then again you may not (and you will like reading the whole book a lot better).
The conclusion about the essence of the entire picture is analogous to what makes a bagel a bagel. The essence of a bagel cannot be found at the center of the piece of dough due to the hole we find right there. And yet the only reason we call the thing a bagel is because of the very hole that is found at its center.
Agreed, this is a simple delivery of a completeness, but it is also complex because getting the deeper layers of the image requires the focus of the writer and the reader to be well-aligned in various aspects. The question can be misunderstood as our looking only for what dough is, but that slightly different question calls for a conclusion of another kind. If we are looking for the essence of dough, then we cannot expect a singular answer because dough is a substance that to some extent will always be complex.
Mentioning dough here is done to further explain the conclusion of this book: there is no singular answer to matter at the material level, while there can be a singular answer to it at the abstract level. The mechanism of matter is complex. But it's not that complex it cannot be understood, for it is easy to understand when the essence of matter is viewed in the right light. It takes climbing an entire mountain in this book before that right light is delivered. But here it is in short: There is a natural variety to the foundation of matter, and — still — at the abstract level we can find satisfying singular answers. A bagel is a thing, and the thing is singular. It is the hole and nothing but the hole that declares the specific piece of dough a bagel, and we can only find the singular outcome at the abstract level (for a bagel is a name lent to a certain shape of dough).
Naturally, this conclusion of the book can be read as if it were something funny, simplistic, and that is why a longer delivery provides a more intriguing and more satisfying answer. How all is organized is not a matter of one truth, but of several truths, and some simple math is used in this book to bring this point home. You may not like all of the writing, but a good and satisfying work-out for the brain is guaranteed (or your money back).
If there were black-and-white deliveries about everything, we would see everything as bagels, for we would always find something missing when trying to get the whole. The truth is that our reality is always full color and yet gray does play an important role in it all, too. While humans are capable of establishing black-and-white deliveries at the abstract level, we need to open our minds to the idea that there is more than one foundation to what matters — plus that we have a magnificent brain capable of turning everything into abstracts, including everything and nothing, all while needing to deal with a good amount of boring gray. A bagel is made of a variety of matter, and within the complexity of matter we must give nothing a fundamental spot.
You see, the final delivery is simple. And complex. But simple. Though complex. ©
Help Spread the Knowledge about Nothing and Everything!
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------
"In Search of a Cyclops" contains scientific information to back up the claim that nothing plays a role in each and every structure that tries to deliver a completed view. While the idea of nothing can be a simple concept in itself, the fact that it is present whenever we try to create a structure about everything makes it imperative that we need to understand the role of nothing before we can understand everything.